Close


 

Submit New Idea

Welcome to Your Ideas. Here you can submit ideas for change, as well as voting and commenting on other students’ ideas. The more votes and comments a post gets, the more likely it’ll be taken to the SUBU Summit or Student Members’ Meeting where students will vote whether to adopt the idea as Union Policy or engage in the suggested action. 

 

Before submitting an Idea

Your ideas can be about anything, from big structural changes to small amendments. They can call for change from within SUBU, BU or the wider community. Your ideas can be action based such as asking the Union to lobby the university on a specific issue or ideological such as supporting a specific group. Prior to every meeting of the SUBU Summit and Students Member’s meeting, the SUBU Summit Chair reviews ideas that fulfil the voting requirements and decides which three should form a motion and be taken to meetings. Motions are discussed and debated, and a final vote is then taken. If approved these motions, then become Union Policy or are acted on.  

You can find out more about Union Policy, as well as viewing the current list of live policies here. Please ensure you look at existing policies before submitting your idea so we can avoid duplicates of policies.  

Please also note the Your Ideas platform is NOT for complaints.  

Example of what IS an Idea: 

For SUBU to lobby BU for lecture and seminar resources to be shared one week in advance.

Example of what IS NOT an Idea: 

Misleading packaging on food sold in SUBU shop.

This is not an Idea as this is something SUBU would action immediately for the health and safety of students. An Idea of this nature would not need to go to a SUBU Summit or Student Members Meeting to be voted upon.  

When submitting your ideas, you’ll be asked to answer the following questions: 

  1. What is your idea – what do you think needs to change, be amended, be introduced;  keep it concise and relevant and use research/data/feedback where necessary to back up your Idea 

  1. How do you see this being achieved – what steps should SUBU take to achieve this, what is the solution to the problem. 

  1. Which Full-Time Officer you think should lead on it?

    1. President 

    2. VP Education 

    3. VP Student Opportunities 

    4. VP Welfare and Community 

  2. What other student groups you think should be involved? - Please list any of our liberation networks, faculties, clubs & societies and student communities.

Once you have submitted an Idea

Ideas are reviewed four times an academic year before each SUBU Summit and the Student Members’ Meeting with a maximum of three ideas being voted on in each meeting. Some ideas, where easy to implement, already in policy, or easy to amend existing policy may be implemented and passed without motion at either of these meetings. 

Once students submit an idea, other students can vote and comment on this to indicate their support or lack thereof for the proposed ideas. Students will be able to  vote in favour of  the idea or to vote against the idea. Ideas require 15 votes in favour to be moved forwards to the discussions stage. Subsequently, ideas with 15 votes against will be rejected.

 

SUBU reserves the right to reject any Idea that poses a financial, reputational or legal risk to the Union.  

 

Once an idea achieves the necessary votes the student who submitted the idea will be invited in by a member of the Democracy and Campaigns team to discuss their idea in greater depth, to provide further context and create a draft policy. This draft policy will then be taken to an agenda setting meeting where Officers will discuss and vote on whether to take the motion to either SUBU Summit or Student Members Meeting.  

If the idea is not selected by the committee to go to meeting, it can receive one of two outcomes; Decline – The idea is closed and updated accordingly but can be resubmitted without time penalty OR Revisit – The idea will be on hold and reviewed again before the next SUBU Summit where it will either be selected to go to meeting or will be Declined. 

If an idea that is made presented as a motion at either the SUBU Summit Meeting or Student Members’ Meeting it will be updated on ‘Your Ideas’ accordingly and made into Union Policy. 

All ideas on the platform will be kept updated accordingly .

 

Your Ideas

  • Ideas 35
  • Submitters 25
  • Last submission 16:53 on 16 Feb 2024
  • Voters 173
  • Commenters 10
  • Current 25
  • Locked 0
  • Passed 7
  • Rejected 3
  • Expired 0

Your Ideas

Please log in to vote on an idea
Back to list
  • -10 score
    12 voters

    Equal Weighted Grades for Each Academic Year

    Current
      My idea proposes that each year has an equal weighting on the final overall grade; year 1 - 33.3% grade weighting, year 2 - 33.3% grade weighting and year 3 - 33.3% grade weighting. See this as a fair way to distribute grades as 120 credits must be attained on each year meaning that to complete each year the same amount of study time must be given, that way I think it would be fair to represent this in the grade distribution. Also students pay £9250 a month so it seems a bit pointless paying the same amount of money for each year if one year is more important than the other.

      How do you see this being achieved?

      I see this being achieved if there is big public support for this system and the academic officer favours students preference towards this system.

      Which Full-Time Officer should lead on it?

      VP Education.

      What other student groups should be involved?

    Zainab Abdul-Obitayo
    1pm on 25 Jan 24 I don't that this is a realistic or sensible idea. First year is intended to introduce students to the university system and the education style. By making those grades count in the final one, this would drastically reduce students ability to learn and improve their academic skills without negative impacts.
    Anthony Douglas
    5:22pm on 1 Feb 24 The only problem is though that you pay the same amount of university tuition fees every year so for none of the degree to count for first and only a small proportion for second seems like a bad idea. The reason I think this because if individuals feel like they aren’t going to do much work towards their actual degree grade then I suppose it gives students less motivation to try early on and not take it seriously. Also students are still having to pay massive amounts of money so it would be good if people got something for the effort they put in early on and some people may do better in first year and some may do better in third year. Not everyone is the same. Also students could still learn because say their first year was not the best and they scored 60% as a n example, those students then have a chance to do better from what they have learnt to bring up their overall average by scoring say 70% in second and then 80% in third year to average at a first.