Close


 

Welcome to SUBU's Your Idea Platform!

This is where your ideas make real change!

 

This platform is for submitting ideas for change across SUBU, BU and Beyond. Below you can also vote and comment on other ideas, and popular ideas will be taken to our Student Meetings to decide whether it will become SUBU Policy!

 

Submit New Idea

Before submitting your idea

Before you submit your idea, consider what it is you want to change. This can be big structural changes or small amendments. They can call for change from within SUBU, BU or even the wider community. Your idea could be action based such as having SUBU lobby the university on an issue or your idea can be more ideological such as supporting a specific group or cause.

You can find out more about Union Policy, as well as viewing the current list of live policies here. Please ensure you look at existing policies before submitting your idea so we can avoid duplicates of policies.  

Please also note the Your Ideas platform is NOT for complaints.  

Example of what IS an Idea: 

For SUBU to lobby BU for lecture and seminar resources to be shared one week in advance.

Example of what IS NOT an Idea: 

Misleading packaging on food sold in SUBU shop.

This is not an Idea as this is something SUBU would action immediately for the health and safety of students. An Idea of this nature would not need to go to a SUBU Summit or Student Members Meeting to be voted upon.  

When submitting your ideas, you’ll be asked to answer the following questions: 

  1. What is the problem or idea? – what do you think needs to change, be amended, be introduced;  keep it concise and relevant and use research/data/feedback where necessary to back up your Idea 

  1. How is your suggested solution? – what steps should SUBU take to achieve this, what is the solution to the problem. 

  1. Which Full-Time Officer you think should lead on it?

    1. President 

    2. VP Education 

    3. VP Student Opportunities 

    4. VP Welfare and Community 

Once you have submitted your idea

We review ideas continously throughout the year, but an idea can only become policy at one of four democratic student meetings. Each meeting usually takes three ideas to be voted on by attendees but this may differ throughout the year. Additionally, some ideas may be easy to implement, already in policy or can be done without the need of an approved policy, in which case we will action these seperately.

Once students submit an idea, other students can vote and comment on this to indicate their support or lack thereof for the proposed ideas. Students will be able to  vote in favour of  the idea or to vote against the idea. Ideas require 15 votes in favour to be moved forwards to the discussions stage. Subsequently, ideas with 15 votes against will be rejected.

SUBU reserves the right to reject any Idea that poses a financial, reputational or legal risk to the Union. SUBU may also reject an idea if it does not align with our student-led and informed strategy found here.

Once an idea achieves the necessary votes the student who submitted the idea will be invited in by a member of the Democracy and Campaigns team to discuss their idea in greater depth, to provide further context and create a draft policy. This draft policy will then be taken to an agenda setting meeting where Officers will discuss and vote on whether to take the motion to either SUBU Summit or Student Members Meeting.  

If the idea is not selected by the committee to go to meeting, it can receive one of two outcomes; Decline – The idea is closed and updated accordingly but can be resubmitted without time penalty OR Revisit – The idea will be on hold and reviewed again before the next SUBU Summit where it will either be selected to go to meeting or will be Declined. 

If an idea that is made presented as a motion at either the SUBU Summit Meeting or Student Members’ Meeting it will be updated on ‘Your Ideas’ accordingly and made into Union Policy. 

All ideas on the platform will be kept updated accordingly .

Your Ideas

  • Ideas 48
  • Submitters 37
  • Last submission 14:40 on 20 Sep 2024
  • Voters 204
  • Commenters 16
  • Current 6
  • Locked 0
  • Passed 13
  • Rejected 4
  • Expired 25

Your Ideas

Back to list
  • 2 up votes 0 down votes
    2 voters

    Enhancing Fairness in Self and Peer Assessments SPA: Addressing Bias and Improving Inclusivity in Group Evaluations

    Expired
      Self and peer assessment (SPA) is crucial for evaluating group interactions, yet it poses significant challenges, particularly for students with disabilities, different communication styles, and those from diverse cultural backgrounds, including students with additional learning support needs (ALS), who may be undiagnosed and thus exceptionally vulnerable to SPA biases. Concerns from the student body, including 14 individuals, underscore the SPA's potential bias, affecting grades and possibly marginalizing certain demographics, such as mature students, ALS students, or those from various cultural backgrounds who might struggle with direct communication styles. Recognizing the importance of people skills, group management, and conflict resolution in certain courses, we still find the current weighting of SPAs—sometimes as high as 40%—to be excessive, especially given its potential to disproportionately impact overall degree grades based on non-academic factors like personal biases within non-friendship groups. This scenario can unfairly disadvantage individuals, particularly when team divisions lead to unjust grading due to personal dislikes, discrimination, or bullying. To address these issues, we propose implementing strict guidelines for conducting SPAs that focus on key factors such as attendance, constructive communication, meeting agreed-upon goals, and teamwork, barring valid excuses. This approach aims to prevent biased SPA reports from adversely affecting specific student groups, thereby allowing for a more accurate reflection of team dynamics and individual contributions. Moreover, reconsidering the significant weight SPAs hold in overall grading is essential. Adjusting this weighting and introducing structured guidelines will foster a fairer assessment system. Such a system would better accommodate all students, including those with ALS and undiagnosed learning challenges, ensuring assessments accurately reflect each student's contributions and achievements without allowing non-academic dynamics within groups to overly influence overall degree outcomes

      What is your suggested solution?

      To address these issues, we propose implementing strict guidelines for conducting SPAs that focus on key factors such as attendance, constructive communication, meeting agreed-upon goals, and teamwork, barring valid excuses. This approach aims to prevent biased SPA reports from adversely affecting specific student groups, thereby allowing for a more accurate reflection of team dynamics and individual contributions.

      Which Full-Time Officer should lead on it?

      VP Education and VP Student Opportunities
    No comments have been made.